Table 4.
Relative number of infected leaf segments of mlo cultivars in tests 1 & 2.
|
|
Source of isolates |
|||||
|
|
Apex 0 |
Apex + |
mlo cvs |
|||
|
|
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
|
GP |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
Chariot |
4 |
16 |
43 |
24 |
54 |
2 |
|
Hart |
4 |
11 |
21 |
19 |
21 |
5 |
|
Landlord |
0 |
6 |
4 |
8 |
14 |
5 |
|
Riviera |
4 |
20 |
29 |
35 |
25 |
17 |
|
Derkado |
11 |
8 |
21 |
23 |
14 |
2 |
|
Chalice |
46 |
49 |
64 |
59 |
75 |
38 |
|
Decanter |
0 |
0 |
25 |
4 |
18 |
2 |
|
Static |
0 |
2 |
14 |
3 |
21 |
5 |
|
Apex |
25 |
2 |
32 |
29 |
50 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative number of segments of mlo cultivars infected |
9 |
13 |
25 |
20 |
29 |
9 |